站内搜索
  您现在的位置: 科学技术哲学专业网 >> 人大科哲 >> 学界交流 >> 学术视点 >> 正文
刘大椿:人文社会科学评价中若干亟待矫正之问题
  作者:刘大椿    文章来源:本站原创    点击数:    更新时间:2010-7-14    
】【】【

as the absolute judgment for the existing value of the evaluation object, while the evaluation is actually “the evaluation on evaluation” was neglected. It is not possible to be totally objective, but seeking for a consensus is still needed. Scientific research administration calls the turn in the implementation of evaluation standard to a great extent. Evaluation is not only served for administration, in a certain sense, evaluation is all about administration. We should realize the conflicts between the evaluation standards of humanities and social sciences, the evaluation standards of study on basic theory and application, qualitative evaluation standard and quantitative evaluation standard, and handle appropriately. In addition, we should deal with serious problems in the implementation of the humanities and social sciences evaluation nowadays, including problems of evaluation subject and evaluation procedure, problems of insufficient study on the complexity of humanities and social sciences achievements, problems of insufficient study on the limitations of evaluation methods, and problems of neglect on the indigenization of the humanities and social sciences evaluation.

Key WordsHumanities and Social SciencesEvaluationStandardManagementImplementation



[1] “社会科学成果的评估实质上是一种价值判断。”见卜卫,周海宏等:《社会科学成果价值评估》,57页,北京,社会科学文献出版社,1999

[2] 欧阳康:《人文社会科学哲学》,396-397页,武汉,武汉大学出版社,2002

[3] 显然,这里的客观性不同于经验科学中的客观性涵义,它是指超越个体判断基础上的共识性判断。而共识之所以可能的一个重要基础在于一些基本的共同事实认定。

[4] 卜卫,周海宏等:《社会科学成果价值评估》,61页,北京,社会科学文献出版社,1999

[5] 如我们把系统方法定义为“是指一套以系统思维为指导,旨在提高和改善问题过程的效率和有效性而发展出来的一套原则和步骤。”朱志昌:《当代西方系统运动》,见许国志:《.系统科学与工程研究》,604页,上海科技教育出版社,2000

打印】  【关闭】  【返回
Copyright © 2010-2017 www.pstruc.org All Rights Reserved.
京ICP备10216924号;京公网备110108007581